TOWNSEND v. McCALL

6 Div. 587.

78 So.2d 310 (1955)

W. W. TOWNSEND, Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. J. Hal McCALL, Mayor of Tuscaloosa et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jas. J. Mayfield, Jas. W. Harris, Tuscaloosa, for appellant.

S. H. Sprott, Tuscaloosa, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for mandamus to require the City Commission of Tuscaloosa to perform certain acts in connection with the making of a contract to construct a water supply tunnel for the city waterworks system.

The trial court entered a judgment in which he (1) overruled a demurrer of petitioner to a plea in abatement; (2) overruled objections to an amendment of the petition and allowed the amendment; (3) overruled a motion to discontinue the cause on account of such amendment; and (4) (with reference to a motion to dismiss the petition, the following is quoted from it) "the court is of the opinion that the same (motion to dismiss the petition) is well taken and motion granted and rule nisi is set aside and the petition is dismissed",—an exception is noted. That ends the judgment dated April 29, 1953. After a motion for a new trial was denied within thirty days an appeal bond was filed on May 11, 1953.

There is no feature of the judgment which is sufficient to support an appeal. If it were a final judgment dismissing the cause it would be sufficient to that end. Exparte Hendree, 49 Ala. 360. But the attempted dismissal is not complete in form to be a judgment which is sufficient to support an appeal. Davis v. McColloch, 191 Ala. 520, 67 So. 701; Martin v. Alabama Power Co., 208 Ala. 212, 94 So. 76; Cooper v. Cooper, 216 Ala. 366, 113 So. 239; Wallace v. Screws, 225 Ala. 187, 142 So. 572; Webb v. French, 225 Ala. 617, 144 So. 818; Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co., 234 Ala. 313, 174 So. 530; Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co., 257 Ala. 276, 58 So.2d 596; Couch v. Rodgers, 257 Ala. 560, 59 So.2d 809.

The appeal should be dismissed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by FOSTER, Supernumerary Justice of this Court, while serving on it at the request of the Chief Justice under authority of Title 13, section 32, Code, and was adopted by the Court as its opinion.

Appeal dismissed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON, STAKELY, GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., not sitting.

MAYFIELD, J., not sitting, having been of counsel in the court below.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases