1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 40 So.2d
  5. 40 So.2d 333 (1949)
 

GRISSOM v. DAHART ICE CREAM CO.

6 Div. 711.

40 So.2d 333 (1949)

GRISSOM v. DAHART ICE CREAM CO., Inc., et al.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied February 8, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson & Hewitt, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Jos. S. Mead, of Birmingham, for appellee Dahart Ice Cream Co.

Francis H. Hare, of Birmingham, for appellee DeLuxe Cab Co.

CARR, Judge.

The plaintiff below stated her cause of action under one count of her complaint in which the Dahart Ice Cream Company and the DeLuxe Cab Company were named as defendants.

She alleged that she was riding as a passenger for hire in the cab of the latter company, and while so journeying she sustained personal injuries incident to a collision between the car in which she was riding and an automobile operated by an agent of the Dahart Ice Cream Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases