CUMMINGS v. STATE

4 Div. 107.

43 So.2d 326 (1949)

CUMMINGS v. STATE.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

December 1, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clayton & LeMaistre, of Eufaula, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Jas. T. Hardin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant has been convicted for the possession of a still to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited beverages.

The evidence presented by the State was, in our opinion, ample in its tendencies to support the verdict of guilty.

Appellant's able counsel argues only one point in his brief as constituting error. After study of this record we are convinced that the point so argued constitutes the only substantial question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases