1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 2 N.J.
  5. 2 N.J. 235 (1949)
 

A. HOLLANDER & SON, INC. v. IMPERIAL FUR BLENDING CORP.

2 N.J. 235 (1949)

66 A.2d 319

A. HOLLANDER & SON, INC., COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. IMPERIAL FUR BLENDING CORPORATION, PHILIP A. SINGER, RICHARD VILLANI AND ROBERT CARUBA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 16, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback (Mr. Joseph A. Weisman, on the brief; Messrs. Ruback & Albach, attorneys) argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Alton V. Evans argued the cause for the respondents Imperial Fur Blending Corporation, Richard Villani and Robert Caruba.

Mr. Joseph Weintraub (Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein, attorneys) argued the cause for the respondent Philip A. Singer.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

Appellant instituted suit to enforce the terms of an employment contract containing various restrictive covenants and to obtain redress for the use by respondents of its secret processes and formulae. The court below, on the merits of the case, found the contract valid and breached by the conduct of Singer, in which the other respondents participated, but dismissed the bill for the sole reason that shortly after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases