This appeal from a custody determination, pitting a child's foster parents against his biological father, centers on the meaning of the statutory term "best interest of the child," and particularly on the weight to be given a child's bonding with his long-time foster family in deciding what placement is in his best interest. The biological father (appellant) on one side,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MICHAEL B.
80 N.Y.2d 299 (1992)
In the Matter of Michael B. Catholic Child Care Society of Diocese of Brooklyn et al., Respondents; Marvin B., Appellant; Maggie W. L., Intervenor-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 10, 1992.
Decided October 29, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City (
Wallman & Wechsler, P. C., New York City (
Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur with Judge KAYE; Judge BELLACOSA concurs in result in a separate opinion; Judge SMITH taking no part.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.