ANDERSON v. ELI LILLY & CO.


79 N.Y.2d 797 (1991)

Carol Anderson et al., Appellants, v. Eli Lilly & Company et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 18, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman E. Frowley, Leonard L. Finz, Stuart L. Finz and Mark Bower for appellants.

Russel H. Beatie, Jr., Charna L. Gerstenhaber, Charles J. Biederman, David M. Covey and Jack Gross for Eli Lilly & Co. and another, respondents.

Paul K. Stecker and Tamar P. Halpern for E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur; Judges HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA taking no part.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, whose wife allegedly suffered certain injuries to her reproductive system due to her in utero exposure to the drug diethylstilbestrol (DES), commenced this action against defendants, several manufacturers of DES, asserting a derivative cause of action for loss of consortium. Prior to trial, defendants moved for summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases