1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 58 Ohio
  5. 58 Ohio St. 3d 103 (1991)
 

IN RE ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 6, 1990 FOR THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO

No. 90-2544.

58 Ohio St. 3d 103 (1991)

IN RE ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 6, 1990 FOR THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 11, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thompson, Hine & Flory, William C. Wilkinson, Gordon M. Strauss, Elizabeth B. Wright and Julie D. Vannatta, for contestor.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Richard M. Markus, Kathleen M. O'Malley, Kaufman & Cumberland Co., L.P.A., and Steven S. Kaufman, for contestee.

Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Becker and Mark Landes, special counsel for Secretary of State.

MOYER, C.J.

Were the allegations of contestor's petition supported by the required weight of the evidence, we would be required to set aside the election for Attorney General. However, our thorough examination of the evidence and arguments of the parties cause us to conclude that contestor has not met his burden of proof to overturn the election. Therefore, for the following reasons, we enter judgment for contestee.

I

Burden of Proof

We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases