NEWMAN v. CHASE


70 N.J. 254 (1976)

359 A.2d 474

HOWARD C. NEWMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR D. CHASE AND DOROTHY A. CHASE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 18, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jonathan Kohn argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Rothbard and Lewis, attorneys; Mr. Kohn, on the brief).

Mr. Russell H. Hulsizer argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by MOUNTAIN, J.

Plaintiff, Howard C. Newman, purchased from the trustee in bankruptcy of defendant, Arthur D. Chase, all of the latter's interest in certain property owned by Chase and his wife, Dorothy A. Chase, as tenants by the entirety. Mrs. Chase is also a defendant in this action. The property is the home of the defendants. Plaintiff seeks partition of the estate for the joint lives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases