HARTLINE v. SHEET METAL WORKERS' NAT. PENSION FUND

No. 01-7078.

286 F.3d 598 (2002)

Robert E. HARTLINE, et al., Appellants, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND, et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 23, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Preminger argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was George M. Chuzi.

Steuart H. Thomsen argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Nicholas T. Christakos and Stephen M. Rosenblatt.

Before: EDWARDS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

The parties have raised two main issues on appeal. The first is whether a transferee court is bound by the substantive law of the transferor court when a federal law claim is transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The second is whether the actions taken by the appellees with respect to the multiemployer pension plan were actions subject to review under the fiduciary duty provisions found in section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases